I think a deep dive into some of the evidence preterist teachers present would be interesting and much needed. It is a growing belief as more people stumble across more and more of it on the internet. The opposition to preterism is far too quick to dismiss, perhaps not realizing how in depth the teachings are. In other words, it would be far too easy for a preterist to have an alternative explanation for “evidence” against it. Many times the rebuttals by preterists are well established and not rebuked.